Below are some advantages of LED.
-Full light spectrum -very high efficiency/efficacy -can be much closer to the plant -Better quality end product -Fully modular -passively cooled, no more fans going and/or making noise -min Water consumption -less evaporation -less power consumption -less heat -much less cooling required -very safe -the lamps do not have to be replaced every half year or year -you do not save Only energy on light but over the entire cycle (cooling etc) -very long lifespan L90 > 61.000 hrs -2 years warranty on the C.O.B. 's of Cr ee!
-7 Year warranty on the power supplies of Mean Well!
-There are subsidies to be given to the energy InvesteringsAfstrek (EIA), for more information you can view this energy InvesteringsAftrek2017 PDF of the Netherlands entrepreneurial service for the small-scale customer are the above Points of course also applicable.
Main point for the small man is a superior quality end product with at least 40% less power consumption than before and therefore lower production costs.
It can also relieve at least 40% of the surface with the same power consumption as before.
The LED also goes extremely long with no decrease in light output. After 60,000 hours/6.85 years, the LED still produces more than 90% of the original light.
The output of the Gavita 1000w is 2.1 µmol per watt at lamp level.
By using the reflector, only 1.8 µmol per Watt is left.
The total output of this is then 1800 µmol.
The Dimlux CMH630 produces 1.85 µmol per watt or this at the lamp level.
I assume that they have incorporated the loss of the reflector in here
According to the datasheet, the lamp on 760W has a total output of 1411 mol.
The output of an old-fashioned 600 watt HPS lamp is 1.2 µmol per watt.
The total output of this lamp is 720 µmol.
My LED system delivers 2.4 mol per watt at the lamp level.
By that I prefer not to use a reflector there is also no loss of light.
To match the Gavita in terms of output, we have led 1400/2.4 = 583.33 Watts needed, saving 400 Watt per hour.
To match the Dimlux we have led 1100/2.4-= 458.33 Watts needed, saving 250 Watt per hour.
To match the old-fashioned HPS have led me with 600/2.4 = 250Watts needed, saving 350 Watt per hour.
We can also control the lamps slightly, so you need less, but this is at the expense of your efficiency.
Why the system is best.
The system has the best cooling of all.
This allows the led to run at the lowest possible temperature, allowing extra light to be extracted from the LED and further increases the lifespan.
The system is modular and always adaptable to new generation LEDs, for example.
Also there is no maintenance to the system because everything is passive, if maintenance is needed then this is very simple by the modular.
Locatie: Noord-Holland - Amsterdam
Toegevoegd op 2 dagen geleden en vervalt op 21 December
Advertentie id: 835019
[ ]
109 bezoeken
